Newsletters - [ The archives ]
|
|
|
The Early May, 2007 Edition |
| What Are We Fighting For?, Inc. Newsletter |
|
|
|
| In This Issue |
| SITREP |
| ABOUT BOB . . . |
| ABOUT DAVE . . . |
| TELLING IT LIKE IT IS . . . Two Different Wars, One Destructive Parallel, by Hoi B. Tran |
| Right Ideas' Radio Program |
| THE EAGLE'S NEST . . . On Sheep, Wolves, and Sheepdogs, by LTC (RET) Dave Grossman |
| IN THIS SPOT LIGHT . . . Remembering AKKI, by Bob Anderson, CMSgt (RET) |
| TIME TO CHUCKLE . . . God Bless Mothers Who Drug Us! |
| OF SPECIAL INTEREST . . . It Will Be The Death of Liberalism, by Raymond Kraft |
| THE CHIEF'S CORNER . . . What We Did Not Learn From Viet Nam - My Opinion, by Bob Anderson, CMSgt (Ret) |
| ON THE LIGHTER SIDE . . . What Does Love Mean?, by Author Unknown |
| THE CHAPLAIN'S CORNER . . . Christian Soldiers, by Chaplain B. J. Garner |
| Support our Military! |
| Contact Us |
|
Quick Links |
|
What Are We Fighting For?™
|
|
Announcements |
|
Prefer America radio program (***** Star Rating by Bob Anderson)
Listen every Sunday from 4:00 to 5:00 PM (CST)
KSKY Radio, 660 AM (a Texas radio station)
|
|
Announcements |
|
AIR FORCE SECURITY POLICE ASSOCIATION (AFSPA) VETERANS
We're looking for a few good men and women to build a strong association for all who have served or are serving in the Air Force Security career field; Air Police, Security Police, Security Forces, Active, Guard and Reserves.
We're a world-wide 2500 member AFSPA organization, founded in 1986 to preserve our heritage, support our active duty men and women, assist members for employment, and pledged to help our members in personal crises.
Membership is also open to all who have served honorably in the Army MP's, Navy Master of Arms, Marine MP's, and others with law enforcement background.
For more information about our growing fraternity, let's meet on our website
www.afspaonline.org, or call the AFSPA San Marcos, Texas headquarters at (512) 396-5444, or toll free 1-888-250-9876 for more information.
Honor the past, recognize the present and prepare for the future: These are our commitments.
Join us if you can. You'll be glad you did. Please help us pass the word about AFSPA!
|
New York Tatical Expo
LTC (RET) Dave Grossman |
|
|
Here you will see photos that you will NOT see in the main stream media. Now see the other side of the story.
CLICK HERE to view photos on the What Are We Fighting For?™ website.
Association Members are invited to send pictures to be posted on the What Are We Fighting For?™ website. Mail to: What Are We Fighting For?, Inc., P.O. Box 2428, Brenham, Texas 77834-2428 (Please, include self addressed stamped envelope if you want photos returned) Or email digital pictures to: SusanD@WhatAreWeFightingFor.com.
| |
|
Dear Member
With this SITREP I will expand on my previous SITREP. Things continue to go well with What Are We Fighting For?™ and our membership is growing. As we continue to get the word out to other fellow citizens who share our concerns, the ranks will continue to grow. One of the best ways to accomplish this is for us to speak as often as possible with like minded Americans and make them aware that WAWFF (What Are We Fighting For?™) exists and they are not alone in their concerns.
Secondarily, we ask that each of you share our website and newsletters with your friends, colleagues and family members. It is from this grassroots effort that the greatest number of contacts will be made and WAWFF can be a catalyst for change.
Additionally, we are spreading the word by making presentations to churches, civic organizations, American Legion and the Veterans of Foreign War (VFW) chapters and district meetings. On April 22nd, I spoke at the District 7 conference for the Texas American Legion. These great Americans met in New Caney, Texas and heard about WAWFF for the first time. They we pleased to hear of the effort and offer support.
The Auxiliary from Post 618 from Willis, Texas has taken on a phenomenal effort to support out troops. They have collected underwear and shower shoes that will be sent to Balad Air Base, Iraq. You may not realize this but when our wounded arrive at Balad for treatment, often their uniforms have to be cut off in order for their injuries to be treated. Many times they are evacuated to Ramstein, Germany for further treatment wrapped only in a blanket. The efforts of Post 618's Auxiliary will add a tremendous comfort to our wounded Soldiers, Marines and Airmen.
The next day I drove to Austin, TX to watch a dear friend of mine, Chief Master Sergeant Sam Davis, get appointed as the new Command Chief for the Texas Air Guard. He will replace CMSGT Harold Higgins who for the last six years has held the post.
On the way back from Austin I stumbled across a great radio program called Prefer America, KSKY radio, a Texas radio station at 660 on the AM dial. I was so inspired by it that I called the show. A young man named David Allen Scholl was the host and one of the best I've heard in years. Simply put, too often I find the passion of talk radio hosts has been replaced by the profession of being on the radio. Their righteous indignation is often replaced by the drive for ratings; I'll speak more about this in the next newsletter. David really impressed me by his depth of knowledge, willingness to allow dialog and debate with folks whose beliefs do not coincide with ours. He was respectful yet dynamic in his support for our troops and our President.
His show, Prefer America runs every Sunday from 4:00 to 5:00 PM (CST) ─ I encourage each of you to listen and tell others about it. This is the type of professionalism we need in talk radio. I don't know about you but I often get tired of the egos and vitriolic demeanor of other hosts. You can't change people's minds if you are insulting and dogmatic. Now, don't get me wrong - there are times when you have to raise the red flag and tell someone they are full of crap!
Most folks that I have talked to on the left are not full of crap, they are simply misinformed! President Regan once said, "The problem with our friends on the left is not that they are ignorant, it is that so much of what they know is not true." Truth and professionalism are necessary if we are going to educate the other half of our nation.
Dave Bond, Col, USAF (Ret) has spoken to several large gatherings in California, including the Republican Women's Group and the Legion of Merit Organization. Col Bond is definitely getting the word out in California and frankly I've been pleasantly surprised to find not everyone in California is a left wing liberal. There are actually a lot of true and dedicated conservatives out there.
Radio and television will be our focus for the next several months. With help from good friends and dedicated Americans, we expect to contact more that 20 million radio listeners and television listeners. This is by far one of the best ways for us to reach large numbers of citizens and let them know that while America has problems ─ America ain't the problem ─ and to share some good news for a change. If you have contacts that can assist us in our efforts, please let me know ─ we appreciate your help and support.
Within a few weeks, the FORUM section of our website will up and running. This has been one of the most often requested items and we are please to announce we are in final testing of the functionality and will be going live shortly.
Till the next time, God Bless America and you.
  Bob Anderson, PhD, CMSgt USAFR (Ret) 936.520.9696
|
ABOUT BOB
BOB ANDERSON, PhD, CMSgt USAFR (Ret)
Bob Anderson is a decorated military veteran with over 32 years of service. His last military assignment was with the Expeditionary Security Forces Squadron, Balad Air Base, Iraq. He was awarded the Bronze Star for his service in Iraq. He retired as a Chief Master Sergeant with the US Air Force Reserves.
Bob is the president and founder of What Are We Fighting For?, Inc., an organization providing leadership and guidance across the nation in support of our troops and the re-Americanization of America. Additionally, he is president and founder of Back to Basics International, sits on the Board of Directors for the World Safety Organization, the WSO Accreditation Committee and chairs the Ethics Committee. He's a member of various veteran organizations, holds two PhD's and is a published author.
|
ABOUT DAVE
COLONEL DAVID A. BOND, U.S. AIR FORCE (RET)
Dave Bond is the Vice President for West Coast Operations for What Are We Fighting For?, Inc. During his 28 year military career he commanded eight Security and Anti-terrorism units and was Assistant Deputy Chief of Staff, Security Police, Headquarters Air Force in Europe overseeing the European Air Forces Anti-terrorism Program.
Heavily involved in the raid on Libya by the United States, he was responsible for the deployment of personnel securing B-52 Bombers conducting raids on the Iraq Republican Guard Forces and the coalition forces bases which launched aircraft during Desert Shield and Storm.
Dave Bond has been featured on radio talk shows and TV specials talking about Chemical and Biological Terrorism threats and how the U.S. and individuals can prepare and deal with these threats.
| |
|
COMING SOON! |
By overwhelming demand of our members, we are pleased to announce that we'll be launching a Forum section on our website. |

Two Different Wars, One Destructive Parallel
by Hoi B. Tran, Former Major, VNAF
After the fall of the Republic of Vietnam (RVN aka South Vietnam) on April 30, 1975, from the White House, President Ford issued an official statement: "The Government of the Republic of Vietnam has surrendered. Prior to its surrender, we have withdrawn our Mission from Vietnam. Vietnam has been a wrenching experience for this nation...History must be the final judge of that which we have done or left undone, in Vietnam and elsewhere. Let us calmly await its verdict."
The hindsight of history substantiated with facts from recent declassified top-secret national security materials makes the long awaited verdict convincingly clear. America never lost the war in Vietnam militarily as trumped up by the liberal media and defeatist, biased writers. Ironically, America did abandon South Vietnam because of political division in the U.S. Congress and relentless attacks from the biased liberal media and misinformed or naïve antiwar activists in Washington D.C. (1). Sadly, the RVN was a victim of circumstance.
You need not be a rocket scientist to understand; the proxy war Americans fought in Vietnam over four decades ago and the current war on terror in Iraq are two completely different wars in every aspect of a war. However, in both wars, one destructive parallel exists. The biased liberal mainstream media (2), misinformed antiwar activists to include some former government officials and some Hollywood celebrities are champion in sabotaging our cause, crushing our will, praising and emboldening the enemy (3).
Distorted and negative reports by the liberal media enormously boosted the North Vietnamese Army (NVA) and the National Liberation Front (NLF) morale while destroying American resolve and support for the war (4). Below is the chronology of destructive events leading to the downfall of the RVN:
- August 8, 1968, Presidential candidate Richard M. Nixon's pledge (5) hinted to the North Vietnamese the U.S. will exit Vietnam at any price: "And I pledge to you tonight that the first priority foreign policy objective of our next Administration will be to bring an honorable end to the war in Vietnam. We shall not stop there -- we need a policy to prevent more Vietnams."
- March 2, 1969, the Sino-Soviet split reached its peak and almost led to war. Exploiting this Sino-Soviet confrontation, the U.S played the China-Soviet card seeking detent with the Soviet Union and rapprochement with China to extricate from Vietnam. The Soviet Union and China were two major patrons of North Vietnam.
- November 21, 1970, Jane Fonda, a famous American movie star praised communism in the U.S. In a speech at the University of Michigan in front of an audience of some two thousand students, she openly stated, "If you understood what communism was, you would hope, you would pray on your knees that we would some day become communist."
- January 18, 1971, Senator George McGovern (D.-South Dakota) stated in a speech to announce his candidacy for the 1972 Democratic Presidential Nomination (6): "First, we must have the courage to admit that however sincere our motives, we made a dreadful mistake in trying to settle the affairs of the Vietnamese people with American troops and bombers. I have opposed that intervention from the beginning, while our President and other presidential prospects were supporting it. There is now no way to end it or to free our prisoners except to announce a definite, early date for the withdrawal of every of American soldier. I make that pledge without reservation."
- July 1971, through China Ping Pong diplomacy and with the help of Pakistan President Yahya Khan, Henry Kissinger secretly met China Premier Chou En lai paving the way for the February 21, 1972 summit meeting between President Nixon and Chairman Mao Zedong in China (7). Sino-U.S. rapprochement began.
- June 20, 1972, Henry Kissinger met Chou En lai again in Peking, China to discuss more on details of the Indochina issue (8).
- July 1972, Jane Fonda went to Hanoi and posed with communist gunners on a Soviet built anti-aircraft gun. She also made several anti-America pro-communist broadcasts on Hanoi radio. This is an excerpt of what she said: "One thing that I have learned beyond a shadow of a doubt since I've been in this country is that Nixon will never be able to break the spirit of these people; he'll never be able to turn Vietnam, north and south, into a neo- colony of the United States by bombing, by invading, by attacking in any way. One has only to go into the countryside and listen to the peasants describe the lives they led before the revolution to understand why every bomb that is dropped only strengthens their determination to resist."
- August 23, 1972, in his second race for the White House, President Nixon reasserted he would fulfill his pledge 4 years ago in an attempt to win a second term (9): "As your President, I pledge that I shall always uphold that proud bipartisan tradition. Standing in this Convention Hall 4 years ago, I pledged to seek an honorable end to the war in Vietnam. We have made great progress toward that end. We have brought over half a million men home, and more will be coming home. We have ended America's ground combat role. No draftees are being sent to Vietnam. We have reduced our casualties by 98 percent. We have gone the extra mile, in fact we have gone tens of thousands of miles trying to seek a negotiated settlement of the war. We have offered a cease-fire, a total withdrawal of all American forces, an exchange of all prisoners of war, internationally supervised free elections with the Communists participating in the elections and in the supervision." This gave the North Vietnamese a clear signal the U.S. would accept any terms only to get the POWs back and to leave the RVN to deal with the communist!
- November 14, 1972, to convince the RVN to sign the Paris Peace Accord, President Nixon sent a letter to President Thieu promising: "You have my absolute assurance that if Hanoi fails to abide by the terms of this agreement it is my intention to take swift and severe retaliatory action."
- January 27, 1973, because of increasing political turmoil and antiwar movements in America, re-elected President Nixon forced the RVN to sign the flawed and deadly Paris Peace Accord to end the war in Vietnam.
- June 19, 1973, U.S. Congress passed the Case-Church Amendment forbidding any further U.S. military involvement in Southeast Asia, effective August 15, 1973. The veto-proof vote is 278-124 in the House and 64-26 in the Senate. The Amendment paves the way for North Vietnam to wage yet another invasion of the South, this time without fear of U.S. bombing.
- August 9, 1974, under relentless political pressure and impeachment, President Nixon resigned his presidency. President Gerald R. Ford became the 38th U.S. President.
- September 1974, Congress cut military aid to the RVN substantially and appropriated only $700 millions. This was another deadly blow to the overall morale of the RVN!
- December 13, 1974, North Vietnam tested America's will by attacking Phuoc Long. In response to Hanoi's blatant violation of the Paris Accord, President Ford protested diplomatically only as Congress had banned all military activity in Southeast Asia (10).
- December 18, 1974, Politburo conferred in Hanoi to plan their general offensive.
- January 8, 1975, Hanoi committed 20 divisions to invade the RVN.
- January 14, 1975, Defense Secretary James Schlesinger testified before Congress that the U.S. had failed to fulfill its promises to the RVN when Hanoi seriously violated the Peace Accord.
- January 21, 1975, President Ford stated in a press conference "the U.S. is unwilling to re-enter the war." This was a clear Green Light for Hanoi to proceed with the invasion.
- February 5, 1975, Van Tien Dung secretly infiltrated into South Vietnam to assume command of the final offensive.
- April 30, 1975, the RVN fell into the hand of the North Vietnamese communist.
That was thirty-two years ago. Born and grew up in Hanoi, North Vietnam, I had to leave my hometown to go to South Vietnam when the country was divided at the 17th parallel in 1954. In accordance with the Geneva Agreement, North Vietnam would be under communist regime and the nationalist Vietnamese would govern South Vietnam. That was my first evacuation in pursuit of liberty and freedom. In South Vietnam, I continued to fight communism to protect our way of life but we could not achieve our ultimate goal. In April 1975, I had to flee my motherland again, this time to America, a strange country on the other side of the Pacific. After resettling in America and becoming an American, I thought I would never see war again. Unfortunately, global terrorist Al Qaeda, the enemy of freedom had committed an act of war against our country on September 11, 2001 on our own soil. Global terrorists had forced America into a war to defend freedom and liberty of her citizens.
The war on terror is entering its fourth year. As a concerned citizen, I have been closely following the progress on the war in Iraq. Lately, I began to see some dangerous déjà vu vis a vis the war on terror! It appears the same scenario is being repeated! The battle in the home front is more frustrating and vicious than the fight against the coward terrorists half way around the globe! In this current war on terror, the same trio, the biased liberal media, liberal defeatist members in Congress (11), former government official and misinformed citizens are doing their best to vilify our cause, weaken our military effort and erode our will (12). To make the matter worst, the liberal media and some defeatist members of Congress were capitalizing on the naivety of misinformed citizens to create hatred and despise toward the Administration in a time of war. Of course, terrorists applaud this effort. They would eagerly monitor this political division and antiwar developments in America like the communist in Vietnam did during the Vietnam War. And they are waiting for their liberal American allies in the mainstream media, in Congress and on the streets of America to help them defeat America from Washington D.C. All they need to do now is prolong the war and continue killing Americans in Iraq. This will provide their liberal American allies in America the necessary psychological ammo to cripple our will and eventually, destroy public support for the war.
Having gone through this in the Vietnam War and ended up being a victim of a political defeat over 30 years ago, this writer is concerned watching the same scenario unfolding in America. I strongly believe it is time for America to do what is necessary to win the war on terror rather than to appease the defeatist members of Congress or to fear criticism from the extreme liberal left media. I do not like war because I had lived and fought in the war in Vietnam for freedom almost my entire adolescent and adult life. But I will not hesitate to fight again if my health and age permit. This is a war we must fight and cannot afford to lose. If we lost, global terrorist will bring war and destruction to our own soil. It is time to wake up America!
(1) From Enemy to Friend by Bui Tin. Naval Institute Press 2002, page 107 to 114.
(2) During the Tet offensive in January 1968, when U.S. and Vietnamese Forces almost wiped out the entire infrastructures of the National Liberation Front (NLF) and North Vietnamese Army (NVA) in South Vietnam, Walter Cronkite, the most respected journalist in America reported, "the Vietnam war was unwinnable."
(3) Bui Tin interview by Stephen Young: "Every day our leadership would listen to world news over the radio at 9 a.m. to follow the growth of the American antiwar movement. Visits to Hanoi by people like Jane Fonda, and former Attorney General Ramsey Clark and ministers gave us confidence that we should hold on in the face of battlefield reverses. We were elated when Jane Fonda, wearing a red Vietnamese dress, said at a press conference that she was ashamed of American actions in the war and that she would struggle along with us."
(4) After the war, Col. Bui Tin, a high ranking North Vietnamese officer revealed in an interview with Stephen Young: "Our losses were staggering and a complete surprise;. Giap later told me that Tet had been a military defeat, though we had gained the planned political advantages when Johnson agreed to negotiate and did not run for re-election. The second and third waves in May and September were, in retrospect, mistakes. Our forces in the South were nearly wiped out by all the fighting in 1968. It took us until 1971 to re-establish our presence, but we had to use North Vietnamese troops as local guerrillas. If the American forces had not begun to withdraw under Nixon in 1969, they could have punished us severely. We suffered badly in 1969 and 1970 as it was."
(5) Presidential Nomination Acceptance speech at Republican National Convention in Miami Beach, Florida on August 8, 1968 published by Nixon/Agnew Campaign Committee: "And I pledge to you tonight that the first priority foreign policy objective of our next Administration will be to bring an honorable end to the war in Vietnam. We shall not stop there -- we need a policy to prevent more Vietnams."
(6) Statement by Senator George McGovern (D.-S.D.) announcing candidacy for the 1972 Democratic Presidential Nomination on January 18, 1971 in Sioux Falls, South Dakota. McGovern for President Press Release.
(7) The National Security Archive. President Nixon met Chairman Mao in China. http://www.gwu.edu/%7Ensarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB145/index.htm
(8) The National Archives. Dr. Kissinger met Premier Chou in China. http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB193/HAK%206-20-72.pdf
(9) President Nixon's remarks in his acceptance of the Presidential Nomination of the Republican National Convention on August 23, 1972 for the second term: "As your President, I pledge that I shall always uphold that proud bipartisan tradition. Standing in this Convention Hall 4 years ago, I pledged to seek an honorable end to the war in Vietnam. We have made great progress toward that end. We have brought over half a million men home, and more will be coming home. We have ended America's ground combat role. No draftees are being sent to Vietnam. We have reduced our casualties by 98 percent. We have gone the extra mile, in fact we have gone tens of thousands of miles trying to seek a negotiated settlement of the war. We have offered a cease-fire, a total withdrawal of all American forces, an exchange of all prisoners of war, internationally supervised free elections with the Communists participating in the elections and in the supervision."
(10) Bui Tin interview by Stephen Young: "Well, when Nixon stepped down because of Watergate we knew we would win. Pham Van Dong [prime minister of North Vietnam] said of Gerald Ford, the new president, 'he's the weakest president in U.S. history; the people didn't elect him; even if you gave him candy, he doesn't dare to intervene in Vietnam again.' We tested Ford's resolve by attacking Phuoc Long in January 1975. When Ford kept American B-52's in their hangers, our leadership decided on a big offensive against South Vietnam. We had the impression that American commanders had their hands tied by political factors. Your generals could never deploy a maximum force for greatest military effect."
(11) Meet the Domestic Enemy by John Perazzo on Front Page Magazine March 20, 2007. http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=27465
(12) Former Vice President Al Gore, Sean Penn, Michael Moore, George Soros, Cindy Sheehan.

ABOUT HOI B. TRAN:
He started his military career in June of 1953 in the Vietnamese Air Force, a graduated from United States Air Force - Air Training Command, and retired as a Major in April of 1975. During his 22 years of military service he was; an Aircraft Mechanic; a Flight Instructor - VNAF Air Training Center, Nha Trang; a Fighter Pilot - Flight Leader 2nd Fighter Squadron, Nha Trang; a Fighter Pilot - Flight Leader 83rd Special Air Group, Tan Son Nhat; a Combat Group Commander - 74th Tactical Wing, Can Tho; Commander - Political Warfare Division - 33rd Tactical Wing, Tan Son Nhat; a Airline Pilot - Air Vietnam - Dept. of Transportation-Republic of Vietnam
After resettling in the U.S. in May 1975 he worked in the private sector until retirement in May 2003. During those 28 years Hoi was; the Assistant Director - Demonstration Projects for Asian Americans - State of Washington; Director, Indochinese Service Center - Dept of Emergency Services - State of Washington; Natural Disaster Coordinator - Dept of Emergency Services - State of Washington; Area Manager - Desert Petroleum Inc - Head Office: Oxnard, California; Claims Specialist, Special Investigation Unit - California State Auto Assoc. San Jose, CA; Claims Supervisor, B.I Dept - Insurance Consulting Associates, Inc. Yorba Linda, CA.
Today, Hoi continues to serve his country, America. He is Founder and Site Administrator of http://www.vietamericanvets.com. A site devoted to giving writers an opportunity to share their experiences, give their opinions and show their love of America. On the home page click on the POINT OF VIEW to read articles written by Hoi and other devoted people who share his love of America and believe in "Telling It Like It Is!" Get to know Hoi: FREEDOM AND MORAL.
|
|
We are honored to have the articles for The Eagle's Nest written by Colonels or retired Colonels of the US Military. Eagles are the Colonel's rank.
About Dave Grossman
On Sheep, Wolves, and Sheepdogs
by LTC (RET) Dave Grossman, author of \"On Killing.\" - 08.11.06
Honor never grows old, and honor rejoices the heart of age. It does so because honor is, finally, about defending those noble and worthy things that deserve defending, even if it comes at a high cost. In our time, that may mean social disapproval, public scorn, hardship, persecution, or as always, even death itself. The question remains: What is worth defending? What is worth dying for? What is worth living for? - William J. Bennett - in a lecture to the United States Naval Academy November 24, 1997
One Vietnam veteran, an old retired colonel, once said this to me:
"Most of the people in our society are sheep. They are kind, gentle, productive creatures who can only hurt one another by accident." This is true. Remember, the murder rate is six per 100,000 per year, and the aggravated assault rate is four per 1,000 per year. What this means is that the vast majority of Americans are not inclined to hurt one another. Some estimates say that two million Americans are victims of violent crimes every year, a tragic, staggering number, perhaps an all-time record rate of violent crime. But there are almost 300 million Americans, which means that the odds of being a victim of violent crime is considerably less than one in a hundred on any given year. Furthermore, since many violent crimes are committed by repeat offenders, the actual number of violent citizens is considerably less than two million.
Thus there is a paradox, and we must grasp both ends of the situation: We may well be in the most violent times in history, but violence is still remarkably rare. This is because most citizens are kind, decent people who are not capable of hurting each other, except by accident or under extreme provocation. They are sheep.
I mean nothing negative by calling them sheep. To me it is like the pretty, blue robin's egg. Inside it is soft and gooey but someday it will grow into something wonderful. But the egg cannot survive without its hard blue shell. Police officers, soldiers, and other warriors are like that shell, and someday the civilization they protect will grow into something wonderful. For now, though, they need warriors to protect them from the predators.
"Then there are the wolves," the old war veteran said, "and the wolves feed on the sheep without mercy." Do you believe there are wolves out there who will feed on the flock without mercy? You better believe it. There are evil men in this world and they are capable of evil deeds. The moment you forget that or pretend it is not so, you become a sheep. There is no safety in denial.
"Then there are sheepdogs," he went on, "and I'm a sheepdog. I live to protect the flock and confront the wolf."
If you have no capacity for violence then you are a healthy productive citizen, a sheep. If you have a capacity for violence and no empathy for your fellow citizens, then you have defined an aggressive sociopath, a wolf. But what if you have a capacity for violence, and a deep love for your fellow citizens? What do you have then? A sheepdog, a warrior, someone who is walking the hero's path. Someone who can walk into the heart of darkness, into the universal human phobia, and walk out unscathed
Let me expand on this old soldier's excellent model of the sheep, wolves, and sheepdogs. We know that the sheep live in denial that is what makes them sheep. They do not want to believe that there is evil in the world. They can accept the fact that fires can happen, which is why they want fire extinguishers, fire sprinklers, fire alarms and fire exits throughout their kids' schools.
But many of them are outraged at the idea of putting an armed police officer in their kid's school. Our children are thousands of times more likely to be killed or seriously injured by school violence than fire, but the sheep's only response to the possibility of violence is denial. The idea of someone coming to kill or harm their child is just too hard, and so they chose the path of denial.
The sheep generally do not like the sheepdog. He looks a lot like the wolf. He has fangs and the capacity for violence. The difference, though, is that the sheepdog must not, can not and will not ever harm the sheep. Any sheep dog who intentionally harms the lowliest little lamb will be punished and removed. The world cannot work any other way, at least not in a representative democracy or a republic such as ours.
Still, the sheepdog disturbs the sheep. He is a constant reminder that there are wolves in the land. They would prefer that he didn't tell them where to go, or give them traffic tickets, or stand at the ready in our airports in camouflage fatigues holding an M-16. The sheep would much rather have the sheepdog cash in his fangs, spray paint himself white, and go, "Baa."
Until the wolf shows up. Then the entire flock tries desperately to hide behind one lonely sheepdog.
The students, the victims, at Columbine High School were big, tough high school students, and under ordinary circumstances they would not have had the time of day for a police officer. They were not bad kids; they just had nothing to say to a cop. When the school was under attack, however, and SWAT teams were clearing the rooms and hallways, the officers had to physically peel those clinging, sobbing kids off of them. This is how the little lambs feel about their sheepdog when the wolf is at the door.
Look at what happened after September 11, 2001 when the wolf pounded hard on the door. Remember how America, more than ever before, felt differently about their law enforcement officers and military personnel? Remember how many times you heard the word hero?
Understand that there is nothing morally superior about being a sheepdog; it is just what you choose to be. Also understand that a sheepdog is a funny critter: He is always sniffing around out on the perimeter, checking the breeze, barking at things that go bump in the night, and yearning for a righteous battle. That is, the young sheepdogs yearn for a righteous battle. The old sheepdogs are a little older and wiser, but they move to the sound of the guns when needed right along with the young ones.
Here is how the sheep and the sheepdog think differently. The sheep pretend the wolf will never come, but the sheepdog lives for that day. After the attacks on September 11, 2001, most of the sheep, that is, most citizens in America said, "Thank God I wasn't on one of those planes." The sheepdogs, the warriors, said, "Dear God, I wish I could have been on one of those planes. Maybe I could have made a difference." When you are truly transformed into a warrior and have truly invested yourself into warrior hood, you want to be there. You want to be able to make a difference.
There is nothing morally superior about the sheepdog, the warrior, but he does have one real advantage. Only one. And that is that he is able to survive and thrive in an environment that destroys 98 percent of the population. There was research conducted a few years ago with individuals convicted of violent crimes. These cons were in prison for serious, predatory crimes of violence: assaults, murders and killing law enforcement officers. The vast majority said that they specifically targeted victims by body language: slumped walk, passive behavior and lack of awareness. They chose their victims like big cats do in Africa, when they select one out of the herd that is least able to protect itself.
Some people may be destined to be sheep and others might be genetically primed to be wolves or sheepdogs. But I believe that most people can choose which one they want to be, and I'm proud to say that more and more Americans are choosing to become sheepdogs.
Seven months after the attack on September 11, 2001, Todd Beamer was honored in his hometown of Cranbury, New Jersey. Todd, as you recall, was the man on Flight 93 over Pennsylvania who called on his cell phone to alert an operator from United Airlines about the hijacking. When he learned of the other three passenger planes that had been used as weapons, Todd dropped his phone and uttered the words, "Let's roll," which authorities believe was a signal to the other passengers to confront the terrorist hijackers. In one hour, a transformation occurred among the passengers - athletes, business people and parents -- from sheep to sheepdogs and together they fought the wolves, ultimately saving an unknown number of lives on the ground.
There is no safety for honest men except by believing all possible evil of evil men. - Edmund Burke
Here is the point I like to emphasize, especially to the thousands of police officers and soldiers I speak to each year. In nature the sheep, real sheep, are born as sheep. Sheepdogs are born that way, and so are wolves. They didn't have a choice. But you are not a critter. As a human being, you can be whatever you want to be. It is a conscious, moral decision.
If you want to be a sheep, then you can be a sheep and that is okay, but you must understand the price you pay. When the wolf comes, you and your loved ones are going to die if there is not a sheepdog there to protect you. If you want to be a wolf, you can be one, but the sheepdogs are going to hunt you down and you will never have rest, safety, trust or love. But if you want to be a sheepdog and walk the warrior's path, then you must make a conscious and moral decision every day to dedicate, equip and prepare yourself to thrive in that toxic, corrosive moment when the wolf comes knocking at the door.
For example, many officers carry their weapons in church? They are well concealed in ankle holsters, shoulder holsters or inside-the-belt holsters tucked into the small of their backs. Anytime you go to some form of religious service, there is a very good chance that a police officer in your congregation is carrying. You will never know if there is such an individual in your place of worship, until the wolf appears to massacre you and your loved ones.
I was training a group of police officers in Texas, and during the break, one officer asked his friend if he carried his weapon in church. The other cop replied, "I will never be caught without my gun in church." I asked why he felt so strongly about this, and he told me about a cop he knew who was at a church massacre in Ft. Worth, Texas in 1999. In that incident, a mentally deranged individual came into the church and opened fire, gunning down fourteen people. He said that officer believed he could have saved every life that day if he had been carrying his gun. His own son was shot, and all he could do was throw himself on the boy's body and wait to die. That cop looked me in the eye and said, "Do you have any idea how hard it would be to live with yourself after that?"
Some individuals would be horrified if they knew this police officer was carrying a weapon in church. They might call him paranoid and would probably scorn him. Yet these same individuals would be enraged and would call for "heads to roll" if they found out that the airbags in their cars were defective, or that the fire extinguisher and fire sprinklers in their kids' school did not work. They can accept the fact that fires and traffic accidents can happen and that there must be safeguards against them.
Their only response to the wolf, though, is denial, and all too often their response to the sheepdog is scorn and disdain. But the sheepdog quietly asks himself, "Do you have and idea how hard it would be to live with yourself if your loved ones attacked and killed, and you had to stand there helplessly because you were unprepared for that day?"
It is denial that turns people into sheep. Sheep are psychologically destroyed by combat because their only defense is denial, which is counterproductive and destructive, resulting in fear, helplessness and horror when the wolf shows up.
Denial kills you twice. It kills you once, at your moment of truth when you are not physically prepared: you didn't bring your gun, you didn't train. Your only defense was wishful thinking. Hope is not a strategy. Denial kills you a second time because even if you do physically survive, you are psychologically shattered by your fear helplessness and horror at your moment of truth.
Gavin de Becker puts it like this in Fear Less, his superb post-9/11 book, which should be required reading for anyone trying to come to terms with our current world situation: "...denial can be seductive, but it has an insidious side effect. For all the peace of mind deniers think they get by saying it isn't so, the fall they take when faced with new violence is all the more unsettling."
Denial is a save-now-pay-later scheme, a contract written entirely in small print, for in the long run, the denying person knows the truth on some level.
And so the warrior must strive to confront denial in all aspects of his life, and prepare himself for the day when evil comes. If you are warrior who is legally authorized to carry a weapon and you step outside without that weapon, then you become a sheep, pretending that the bad man will not come today. No one can be "on" 24/7, for a lifetime. Everyone needs down time. But if you are authorized to carry a weapon, and you walk outside without it, just take a deep breath, and say this to yourself...
"Baa."
This business of being a sheep or a sheep dog is not a yes-no dichotomy. It is not an all-or-nothing, either-or choice. It is a matter of degrees, a continuum. On one end is an abject, head-in-the-sand-sheep and on the other end is the ultimate warrior. Few people exist completely on one end or the other. Most of us live somewhere in between. Since 9-11 almost everyone in America took a step up that continuum, away from denial. The sheep took a few steps toward accepting and appreciating their warriors and the warriors started taking their job more seriously. The degree to which you move up that continuum, away from sheep hood and denial, is the degree to which you and your loved ones will survive, physically and psychologically at your moment of truth.
Lieutenant Colonel Dave Grossman, U. S. Army (Ret.), is the Director of Killology Research Group, www.killology.com
Lt. Col. Dave Grossman is an internationally recognized scholar, author, soldier, and speaker who is one of the world's foremost experts in the field of human aggression and the roots of violence and violent crime.
call 1-870-931-5172 or E-mail info@killology.com to see how you may schedule Lt. Col. Grossman for a speaking or training engagement in your area! |
Remembering Akki
by Bob Anderson, CMSgt USAFR (Ret)
What are we fighting for? Behind the K-9 kennels at one of our Forward Operating Bases is a white, wooden cross. It marks the last resting place of a member of the 732d Expeditionary Security Forces Squadron. His name was Akki and he was a German Sheppard, a K-9.
Not all of us in this fight are people. When I received word that we had lost a valued member of the Air Force Security Forces I was damned and saddened and relieved to know it was the dog and not the handler. Akki died in a tragic room fire obeying the last orders he received. Several folks tried to get him out, three service men suffering smoke inhalation. They even tried to get Akki to attack them, so they could save his life but he defended the last post he was given to the end.
We Cops enjoy as special bond with the K-9s and their handlers. K-9 handlers will feel this loss most directly - they understand more than any of us. While never a handler myself, I have been privileged over the years to work with some great teams and some great dogs.
To the handler, the dog is both his partner and protector. No feeble words I could come up with would make a more fitting tribute to Akki that these written by a dog handler long ago.
The Guardians of the Night
Trust in me my friend, for I am your comrade.
I will protect you with my last breath
When all others have left you
And the loneliness of night closes in,
I will be at your side.
Together we will conquer all obstacles,
And search out those who wish to do harm to others.
All I ask of you is compassion,
And the caring touch of your hands.
It is for you that I will unselfishly give my life
And spend my nights unrested.
Although our days together
May be marked by the passing of the seasons
Know that each day by your side is my reward.
My days are measured by
The coming and going of your footsteps.
I anticipate them at every opening of the door.
You are the voice of caring when I am ill,
The voice of authority when I have done wrong.
Do not chastise me unduly,
For I am your right arm,
The sword at your side.
I attempt to do only what you bid of me.
I seek only to please you and remain in your favor.
Together you and I shall experience
A bond only others like us will understand.
When outsiders see us together,
Their envy will be measured by their disdain.
I will quietly listen to you
And pass no judgment,
Nor will your spoken words be repeated.
I will remain ever silent,
Ever vigilant, ever loyal.
And when our time together is done
And you move on in the world
Remember me with kind thoughts and tale,
For a time we were unbeatable,
Nothing passed among us undetected.
If we should meet again on another street
I will take up, your fight,
I am a Military Working Dog
We are the guardians of the night
What are we fighting for? For Akki it was to please his master, to do his bidding no matter the cost. Akki, he will be remembered.
Bob
"Regard your soldiers as your children, and they will follow you into the deepest valleys. Look on them as your own beloved sons, and they will stand by you even unto death!" - Sun Tzu
|
|
God bless mothers who drug us!
The other day, someone at a store in our town read that a Meth-amphetamine lab had been found in an old farmhouse in the adjoining county and he asked me a rhetorical question, ''Why didn't we have a drug problem when you and I were growing up?''
I replied that I had a drug problem when I was young:
I was drug to church on Sunday morning.
I was drug to church for weddings and funerals.
I was drug to family reunions and community socials no matter the weather.
I was drug by my ears whenever I was disrespectful to adults.
I was also drug to the woodshed when I disobeyed my parents, told a lie, brought home a bad report card, did not speak with respect, spoke ill of the teacher or the preacher, or if I didn't put forth my best effort in everything that was asked of me.
I was drug to the kitchen sink to have my mouth washed out with soap if I uttered a profane four-letter word.
I was drug out to pull weeds in mom's garden and flower beds and cockleburs out of dad's fields.
I was drug to the homes of family, friends, and neighbors to help out some poor soul who had no one to mow the yard, repair the clothesline, or chop some firewood; and, if my mother had ever known that I took a single dime as a tip for this kindness, she would have drug me back to the woodshed.
Those drugs are still in my veins; and they affect my behavior in everything I do, say, and think. They are stronger than cocaine, crack, or heroin; and, if today's children had this kind of drug problem, America would be a better place. All events are blessings given to us to learn from.
"In the search for me, I discovered truth. In the search for truth, I discovered love. In the search for love, I discovered God. And in God, I have found everything."
|
|
It Will Be the Death of Liberalism
by Raymond Kraft Sunday, October 10, 2004
Sixty-three years ago, Nazi Germany had overrun almost all of Europe and hammered England to the verge of bankruptcy and defeat, and had sunk more than four hundred British ships in their convoys between England and America for food and war materials.
Bushido Japan had overrun most of Asia, beginning in 1928, killing millions of civilians throughout China, and impressing millions more as slave labor.
The United States was in an isolationist and pacifist mood, and most Americans and Congress wanted nothing to do with the European war, or the Asian war.
Then along came Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941, and in outrage Congress unanimously declared war on Japan, and the following day on Germany, which had not attacked us.
It was a dicey thing. We had few allies.
France was not an ally, for the Vichy government of France aligned with its German occupiers. Germany was not an ally, for it was an enemy, and Hitler intended to set up a Thousand Year Reich in Europe. Japan was not an ally, for it was intent on owning and controlling all of Asia. Japan and Germany had long-term ideas of invading Canada and Mexico, and then the United States over the north and south borders, after they had settled control of Asia and Europe.
America's allies then were England, Ireland, Scotland, Canada, Australia, and Russia, and that was about it. There were no other countries of any size or military significance with the will and ability to contribute much of anything to the effort to defeat Hitler's Germany and Japan, and prevent the global dominance of Nazism. And we had to send millions of tons of arms, munitions, and war supplies to Russia, England, and the Canadians, Aussies, Irish, and Scots, because none of them could produce all they needed for themselves.
All of Europe, from Norway to Italy, except Russia in the east, was already under the Nazi heel.
America was not prepared for war. America had stood down most of its military after World War I and throughout the depression. At the outbreak of World War II there were army soldiers training with broomsticks over their shoulders because they didn't have guns, and using cars with ''tank'' painted on the doors because they didn't have tanks. And a big chunk of our navy had just been sunk and damaged at Pearl Harbor.
Britain had already gone bankrupt, saved only by the donation of $600 million in gold bullion in the Bank of England that was the property of Belgium and was given by Belgium to England to carry on the war when Belgium was overrun by Hitler. Actually, Belgium surrendered one day, because it was unable to oppose the German invasion, and the Germans bombed Brussells into rubble the next day anyway, just to prove they could.
Britain had been holding out for two years already in the face of staggering shipping loses and the near-decimation of its air force in the Battle of Britain, and was saved from being overrun by Germany only because Hitler made the mistake of thinking the Brits were a relatively minor threat that could be dealt with later and turning his attention to Russia, at a time when England was on the verge of collapse in the late summer of 1940.
Russia saved America's rear by putting up a desperate fight for two years until the United States got geared up to begin hammering away at Germany. Russia lost something like 24 million people in the sieges of Stalingrad and Moscow, 90% of them from cold and starvation, mostly civilians, but also more than a million soldiers. More than a million! Had Russia surrendered, then, Hitler would have been able to focus his entire campaign against the Brits, then America, and the Nazis would have won that war.
Had Hitler not made that mistake and invaded England in 1940 or 1941, instead, there would have been no England for the United States and the Brits to use as a staging ground to prepare an assault on Nazi Europe. England would not have been able to run its North African campaign to help take a little pressure off Russia while America geared up for battle, and today Europe would very probably be run by the Nazis, the Third Reich, and, isolated and without any allies (not even the Brits). The United States would very probably have had to cede Asia to the Japanese, who were basically Nazis by another name then, and the world we live in today would be very different and much worse.
I say this to illustrate that turning points in history are often dicey things. And we are at another one.
There is a very dangerous minority in Islam that either has--or wants to have, and may soon have--the ability to deliver small nuclear, biological, or chemical weapons, almost anywhere in the world, unless it is prevented from doing so.
France, Germany, and Russia, have been selling these Islamics nations weapons technology at least as recently as 2002, as have North Korea, Syria, and Pakistan--paid for with billions of dollars that Saddam Hussein skimmed from the "Oil For Food" program administered by the United Nations with the complicity of Kofi Annan and his son.
The Jihadis, or the militant Muslims, are basically Nazis in Kaffiyahs. They believe that Islam, a radically conservative (definitely not liberal!) form of Wahhabi Islam, should own and control the Middle East first, then Europe, then the world, and that all who do not bow to Allah should be killed, enslaved, or subjugated. They want to finish the Holocaust, destroy Israel, and purge the world of Jews. This is what they say.
There is also a civil war raging in the Middle East--for the most part not a hot war, but a war of ideas. Islam is having its Inquisition and its Reformation today, but it is not yet known which will win--the Inquisition, or the Reformation.
If the Inquisition wins, then the Wahhabis, or the Jihadis, will control the Middle East, and the OPEC oil, and the United States, European, and Asian economies--the techno-industrial economies--will be at the mercy of OPEC. This is not an OPEC dominated by the well-educated and rational Saudis of today, but an OPEC dominated by the Jihadis.
You want gas in your car? You want heating oil next winter? You want jobs? You want the dollar to be worth anything? You better hope the Jihad, the Muslim Inquisition, loses, and the Islamic Reformation wins.
If the Reformation movement wins, that is, the moderate Muslims who believe that Islam can respect and tolerate other religions, and live in peace with the rest of the world, and move out of the 10th Century into the 21st Century, then the troubles in the Middle East will eventually fade away, and a moderate and prosperous Middle East will emerge.
We have to help the Reformation win, and to do that we have to fight the Inquisition, i.e., the Wahhabi movement, the Jihad, Al Qaeda, the Islamic terrorist movements.
We have to do it somewhere.
We cannot do it nowhere. And we cannot do it everywhere at once.
We have created a focal point for the battle now at the time and place of our choosing, in Iraq. Not in New York, not in London, or Paris, or Berlin, but in Iraq, where we did and are doing two very important things:
(1) We deposed Saddam Hussein. Whether Saddam Hussein was directly involved in 9/11 or not, it is indisputed that Saddam has been actively supporting the terrorist movement for decades. Saddam is a terrorist. Saddam is, or was, a weapon of mass destruction, who is responsible for the deaths of probably more than a million Iraqis and two million Iranians.
(2) We created a battle, a confrontation, a flash point, with Islamic terrorism in Iraq. We have focused the battle. We are killing bad guys there, and the ones we get there we won't have to get here, or anywhere else. We also have a good shot at creating a democratic, peaceful Iraq, which will be a catalyst for democratic change in the rest of the Middle East, and an outpost for a stabilizing American military presence in the Middle East for as long as it is needed.
The Euros could have done this, but they didn't, and they won't. We now know that rather than opposing the rise of the Jihad, the French, Germans, and Russians were selling them arms. We have found more than a million tons of weapons and munitions in Iraq. If Iraq was not a threat to anyone, why did Saddam need a million tons of weapons?
And Iraq was paying for French, German, and Russian arms with money skimmed from the United Nations Oil For Food Program (supervised by U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan and his son) that was supposed to pay for food, medicine, and education, for Iraqi children.
World War II, the war with the German and Japanese Nazis, really began with a ''whimper'' in 1928. It did not begin with Pearl Harbor. It began with the Japanese invasion of China. It was a war for fourteen years before America joined it. It officially ended in 1945--a 17-year war--and was followed by another decade of United States occupation in Germany and Japan to get those countries reconstructed and running on their own again--a 27-year war. World War II cost the United States an amount equal to approximately a full year's GDP--adjusted for inflation, equal to about $12 trillion dollars. World War II cost America more than 400,000 killed in action, and nearly 100,000 still missing in action.
[The Iraq war has, so far, cost the United States about $120 billion, which is roughly what 9/11 cost New York. It has also cost about 1,000 American lives, which is roughly 1/3 of the 3,000 lives that the Jihad snuffed on 9/11.]
But the cost of not fighting and winning World War II would have been unimaginably greater: a world now dominated by German and Japanese Nazism.
Americans have a short attention span, now, conditioned I suppose by 30-minute television shows and 2-hour movies in which everything comes out okay. The real world is not like that. It is messy, uncertain, and sometimes bloody and ugly. It always has been, and probably always will be.
If we do this thing in Iraq successfully, it is probable that the Reformation will ultimately prevail. Many Muslims in the Middle East hope it will. We will be there to support it. It has begun in some countries, Libya, for instance. And Dubai. And Saudi Arabia. If we fail, the Inquisition will probably prevail, and terrorism from Islam will be with us for all the foreseeable future, because the people of the Inquisition, or Jihad, believe that they are called by Allah to kill all the Infidels, and that death in Jihad is glorious.
The bottom line here is that we will have to deal with Islamic terrorism until we defeat it, whenever that is. It will not go away on its own. It will not go away if we ignore it.
If the United States can create a reasonably democratic and stable Iraq, then we have an ''England'' in the Middle East, a platform from which we can work to help modernize and moderate the Middle East. The history of the world is the clash between the forces of relative civility and civilization, and the barbarians clamoring at the gates. The Iraq war is merely another battle in this ancient and never-ending war. And now, for the first time ever, the barbarians are about to get nuclear weapons. Unless we prevent them. Or somebody does.
The Iraq war is expensive, and uncertain, yes. But the consequences of not fighting it and winning it will be horrifically greater. We have four options:
1. We can defeat the Jihad now, before it gets nuclear weapons.
2. We can fight the Jihad later, after it gets nuclear weapons (which may be as early as next year, if Iran's progress on nuclear weapons is what Iran claims it is).
3. We can surrender to the Jihad and accept its dominance in the Middle East, now, in Europe in the next few years or decades, and ultimately in America.
4. Or we can stand down now, and pick up the fight later when the Jihad is more widespread and better armed, perhaps after the Jihad has dominated France and Germany and maybe most of the rest of Europe. It will be more dangerous, more expensive, and much bloodier then.
Yes, the Jihadis say that they look forward to an Islamic America. If you oppose this war, I hope you like the idea that your children, or grandchildren, may live in an Islamic America under the Mullahs and the Sharia, an America that resembles Iran today.
We can be defeatist, as many Democrats and liberals, peace-activists, and anti-war types seem to be, and concede or surrender to the Jihad--or we can do whatever it takes to win this war against them.
The history of the world is the history of civilizational clashes, or cultural clashes. All wars are about ideas--ideas about what society and civilization should be like--and the most determined always win. Those who are willing to be the most ruthless always win. The pacifists always lose, because the anti-pacifists kill them.
In the 20th Century, it was western democracy vs. communism, and before that western democracy vs. Nazism, and before that Western democracy vs. German Imperialism. Western democracy won, three times, but it wasn't cheap, fun, nice, easy, or quick. Indeed, the wars against German Imperialism (World War I), Nazi Imperialism (World War II), and communist imperialism (the 40-year Cold War that included the Vietnam Battle, commonly called the Vietnam War, but itself a major battle in a larger war) covered almost the entire century.
The first major war of the 21st Century is the war between Western Judeo/Christian Civilization and Wahhabi Islam. It may last a few more years, or most of this century. It will last until the Wahhabi branch of Islam fades away, or gives up its ambitions for regional and global dominance and Jihad, or until Western Civilization gives in to the Jihad.
Senator John Kerry, in the debates and almost daily, makes three specious claims:
1. We went to Iraq without enough troops.
We went with the troops the United States military wanted. We went with the troop levels that General Tommy Franks asked for. We deposed Saddam in 30 days with light casualties, much lighter than we expected.
The real problem in Iraq is that we are trying to be nice; we are trying to fight the 1% of the population that is Jihadi, and trying to avoid killing the 99% of the population that is not a threat. We could flatten Fallujah in minutes with a flight of B52s, or seconds with one nuclear cruise missile--but we don't. We're trying to do brain surgery, not cut off the patient's head. The Jihadis amputate heads.
2. We went to Iraq with too little planning.
This is a specious argument too, for it supposes that if we had just had ''the right plan'' the war would have been easy, cheap, quick, and clean. That is not an option. It is a guerrilla war against a determined enemy, and no such war ever has been or ever will be easy, cheap, quick, and clean. This is not television!
3. We proved ourselves incapable of governing and providing security.
This, too, is a specious argument. It was never our intention to govern and provide security. It was our intention from the beginning to do just enough to enable the Iraqis to develop a representative government and their own military and police forces to provide their own security, and that is happening. The United States and the Brits and other countries there have trained over 100,000 Iraqi police and military, now, and will have trained more than 200,000 by the end of next year. We are in the process of transitioning operational control for security back to Iraq. It will take time. It will not go without hitches. This is not television.
Remember, perspective is everything, and America's schools teach too little history. The Cold War lasted from about 1947 to 1989--at least until the Berlin Wall came down in 1989. Forty-two years. Europe spent the first half of the 19th century fighting Napoleon, and from 1870 to 1945 fighting Germany. World War II began in 1928, lasted 17 years, plus a ten year occupation, and the United States still has troops in Germany and Japan. World War II resulted in the death of more than 50 million people, maybe more than 100 million people, depending on which estimates you accept.
The United States has taken a little more than 1,000 Killed-in-Action (KIA) in Iraq. The United States took more than 4,000 KIA on the morning of June 6, 1944, the first day of the Normandy Invasion to rid Europe of Nazi Imperialism. In World War II the United States averaged 2,000 KIA a week for four years. Most of the individual battles of World War II lost more Americans than the entire Iraq war has done so far.
But the stakes are at least as high: a world dominated by representative governments with civil rights, human rights, and personal freedoms--or a world dominated by a radical Islamic Wahhabi movement, and by the Jihad, under the Mullahs and the Sharia.
I do not understand why the American left does not grasp this. Too much television, I guess.
The liberals are supposed to be in favor of human rights, civil rights, liberty, freedom, and all that. But not for Iraqis, I guess. In America, but nowhere else. The 300,000 Iraqi bodies in mass graves in Iraq, not our problem. The United States population is about twelve times that of Iraq, so let's multiply 300,000 by twelve. What would you think if there were 3,600,000 American bodies in mass graves in America because of George Bush? Would you want another country to help liberate America?
''Peace Activists'' always seem to demonstrate where it's safe and ineffective to do so: in America. Why don't we see liberal peace activists demonstrating in Iran, Syria, Iraq, Sudan, North Korea, in the places in the world that really need peace activism the most?
The liberals are supposed to be in favor of human rights, civil rights, democracy, multiculturalism, diversity, etc., but if the Jihad wins, wherever the Jihad wins, it is the end of civil rights, human rights, democracy, multiculturalism, diversity, etc. American liberals who oppose the liberation of Iraq are coming down on the side of their own worst enemy. If the Jihad wins, it is the death of Liberalism. Everywhere the Jihad wins, it is the death of Liberalism.
And American liberals just don't get it.
About the Writer: Raymond Kraft is a lawyer and writer living and working in Northern California. Raymond receives e-mail at rskraft@vfr.net.
Read more of his writings on Right Truth and The New Media Journal.
|

What we did not learn from Viet Nam - my opinion by Bob Anderson, Chief Master Sergeant, USAFR (Ret)
"Those who do not remember the past are destined to repeat it!" - Santana
I entered military service during the Viet Nam Conflict and I remember draft dodgers, protestors, draft card burnings and bra burnings. I remember the way our soldiers, sailors, airmen and Marines were treated when they came home and their service was devalued, they were slandered and it was not until after Desert Storm I saw a movement to "welcome them home."
I fear the War on Terrorism will be our second Viet Nam, because many in this country have lost sight of the objectives, fail to understand the mission, ignore and dishonor those standing in harm's way to protect this country. Like Nam, we face a different enemy and a different type of war fare. In the first six months I spent in Iraq, I felt betrayed by slanted news reports, angered at the way our service and sacrifices were devalued by pundits and politicians. Why not report the great accomplishments and stories of heroism I saw every day? Upon my return, I realized we are making the same mistakes we made in Nam! Turmoil, dissent, political agendas, liberal activists take the spot light while we are in a conflict and service members are in harm's way. What we are being fed by the media about this War on Terrorism is partial truths, sensationalism and is detrimental to the safety of this country. Like Nam, we will win the battles in the field but we are loosing the battle of public support.
Today we exist in closer political and economic proximity to other regions of the world. Television and radio allow me more information from the Middle East and North Korea than from my own children. Yet, we have not learned. Some Americans sit comfortably in easy chairs, oblivious to the conditions our service members live in and wrapped in "blankets of objectivity." They shake their heads at the mounting body count without understanding what those numbers really mean or hearing stories of bravery that happen every day. News coverage of a service member's funeral is a rarity unless people are protesting the war, while family members grieve. Honoring fallen heroes has become a mantra focused on the senselessness of death, while ignoring the dedication and commitment those heroes believed in and how their deaths served to keep others alive.
World War II was the last declared war this country has been involved with. Korea was a police action; Viet Nam was a conflict, Somalia and Bosnia - peace keeping missions. War (by any name or legal status) is a terrible thing. Soldiers on both sides of the conflicts will die! Old men, women and children unable or unwilling to leave the area will be horribly injured and killed! Buildings, roads, airports, train lines and homes will be destroyed! That is the nature of war. Europe capitulated to Hitler's seduction only to find a maniac bent on world domination. Neville Chamberlain thought he had won "peace in our time" only to discover appeasement with evil is no protection from that evil. We cannot make the same mistakes now.
We send billions of dollars overseas to "allies," who have opposed us at almost every UN vote. Politicians are out of touch with the main stream, recently 33 Senators voted AGAINST making English our official language. We can find where one cow with mad-cow-disease is located among the millions and millions of cows in America, but haven't got a clue as to where millions of illegal immigrants and terrorists are located.
I am dissatisfied with the direction this wonderful country is going in and I have a burning to do something. I was shocked on 9/11, but my heart swelled with the spontaneous sprouting of flags on vehicles and front porches, though later I stopped on the road to pick up Ol' Glory when she fell off a car. I know that "Freedom ain't free," I believe this country should be listening to its CITIZENS, I believe that the widow of a World War II veteran deserves Medicaid but an illegal immigrant should not receive free medical and educational aid while she suffers.
I know that our borders could be secured, I want our elected representatives to serve those ideals this country was founded on, I believe the Pledge of Allegiance includes the words "Under God" and I'm not offended by the terms "In God we trust" and "Merry Christmas." I believe that free speech is a right guaranteed by the Constitution to all citizens, not just the left. I am tired of political correctness and "time out." I believe that our laws should be enforced equally for all citizens, I believe that our servicemen and women, our police and firefighters deserve our trust and respect and support.
I believe that marriage is between a man and a woman. I believe in religious freedom yet understand that any religion can be perverted. I am tired of watching our rights being eroded. I have wondered, "What are we fighting for?" I have wondered, "What am I fighting for?" The answer is America!
I call on that great "silent majority," those tired of dialing one for English, those that realize terrorists have struck us in the past and will again in the future, that know individual accountability and responsibility count more when disaster strikes that anything the Federal government can do afterwards, that know family values count and honor and truth are important; and what about faith. I remember an old man who was asked why he believed in a Supreme Being - he answered, "It would take much to be superior to mankind."
I believe in this country and in its citizens, but there has been no clear leadership and direction. I think it is time we stopped confusing activity with accomplishment and got back to basics, before it is too late.
|
|
What Does Love Mean?
Author Unknown
A group of professional people posed this question to a group of 4 to 8 year-olds, "What does love mean?" The answers they got were broader and deeper than anyone could have imagined. See what you think.
"When my grandmother got arthritis, she couldn't bend over and paint her toenails anymore. So my grandfather does it for her all the time, even when his hands got arthritis too. That's love." Rebecca- age 8
"When someone loves you, the way they say your name is different. You just know that your name is safe in their mouth." Billy - age 4 (I love this one)
"Love is when you go out to eat and give somebody most of your French fries without making them give you any of theirs." Chrissy - age 6
"Love is what makes you smile when you're tired." Terri - age 4
"Love is what's in the room with you at Christmas if you stop opening presents and listen." Bobby - age 7 (Wow!)
"If you want to learn to love better, you should start with a friend who you hate," Nikka - age 6 (we need a few million more Nikka's on this planet)
"Love is like a little old woman and a little old man who are still friends even after they know each other so well." Tommy - age 6
"Love is when Mommy gives Daddy the best piece of chicken." Elaine-age 5
"Love is when your puppy licks your face even after you left him alone all day." Mary Ann - age 4
And the final one -- Author and lecturer Leo Buscaglia once talked about a contest he was asked to judge. The purpose of the contest was to find the most caring child. The winner was a four year old child whose next door neighbor was an elderly gentleman who had recently lost his wife. Upon seeing the man cry, the little boy went into the old gentleman's yard, climbed onto his lap, and just sat there. When his Mother asked what he had said to the neighbor, the little boy said, "Nothing, I just helped him cry."
|
Commentary by Bob Anderson: When this project we call What Are We Fighting For? first began I knew an integral part of the leadership must be the inclusion of a Chaplain. I went to my dear friend and comrade B. J. Garner, one of the most Godly men I have had the privilege of knowing. At the end of this article you will find his bio, but for now a word from our Chaplain.
Christian Soldiers
by Chaplain B. J. Garner
Psalms 127:3 "Children are an heritage (gift) from the Lord."
When I was a teenager, I remember singing an old hymn called "Onward Christian Soldiers." The theme of the song was that as soldiers or followers of Christ; we were to allow Him to lead us to victory over evil. We sang the hymn as a march, with much bravado. I still believe those words.
As I have grown older, I have contemplated what it really means to be a "Christian Soldier." I believe a soldier should have certain attributes whether he is in the "Lord's Army", or wears the uniform of the United States of America.
A soldier whom I could respect would have the following qualities:
1. Confidence in himself and in his God.
2. Convictions or beliefs in his cause.
3. Character. A person cannot have character without acting on Biblical principles of right and wrong.
4. Compassion for others, even his enemies.
5. Competence. A person who is not competent is of little use to the Lord or "Uncle Sam."
These five qualities are what we should also strive to instill in our children and grandchildren. When our lives have ended, someone else will work at our jobs and live in our houses. However, what we have helped to impart to our descendants will live after us.
Take that "heritage from the Lord" and invest it wisely.
Chaplain B. J. Garner
B.J. Garner is a former member of the USAF Reserve and the Texas Air National Guard. He ended his career as a Lieutenant Colonel and currently resides in Houston Texas. As head of the Garner Vision Center, Dr. Garner holds degrees as a Registered Pharmacist, Doctor of Optometry and an Optometric Glaucoma Specialist. He and his wife Laura have two married daughters and three grandchildren. He and his wife are active members in the Sagemont Baptist Church.
| |
|
| Support our Military! Freedom ain't FREE. |
|
I am a member of What Are We Fighting For?™ I promise to do my duty to God and country and to be as well informed as I possibly can be in order to make sound and reasoned decisions for the benefit of my family, my friends and my country. I shall always strive to enhance my life by enhancing my citizenship, service and sacrifice to this great country. I believe in personal accountability and responsibility. I believe it is my duty, not the responsibility of the government to take care of myself and my loved ones. I believe that Freedom ain't free.
|
Copyright© 2007 What Are We Fighting For?, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy and Legal. How to Contact us 1 936-520-9696
936.520.9696
| |
|
What Are We Fighting For?, Inc. | 936.520.9696 | 2305 South Day St. # 208 | Brenham | TX | 77833
|
Sunday, September 5, 2010
Sub-Menu:
|
|